|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
2
|
Posted - 2014.11.12 12:27:57 -
[1] - Quote
CCP PLS, my vaga needs love... |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
2
|
Posted - 2014.11.12 13:49:47 -
[2] - Quote
Here, we don't really care about BS, but about medium AC, which are in a worse state.
Actually my vaga / cyna has speed but no damage over 20km, while most of the ships in front of me can project way more damages than i do thanks to RLML, railgun and drones damage.
Where is the point to fly it over a Gila / VNI / Cerb / Ishtar ? Runaway faster when i get blobbed ? But what is the point to hunt if i'm only able to kill frigs before to get blobbed. I'm efting like a fool to get a real fit which can perform well, but it's almost impossible.
Actually, cynabals / Vagabond are good to gank like every other ships but fighting is a real pain, while i constantly need to care about ranges to apply my damages, i could just throw my drones and stay safe at 35km+ with more EHP.
We need you CCP ! |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
2
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 00:15:28 -
[3] - Quote
Bump, i want to pew pew with my cyna. |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
3
|
Posted - 2014.11.16 13:28:41 -
[4] - Quote
Bump coz my vagabond is rusty. |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
3
|
Posted - 2014.11.16 16:25:14 -
[5] - Quote
M1k3y Koontz wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote:Bump coz my vagabond is rusty. And it ain't just the paintjob, amirite?
Did tried my vaga recently, couldnt stay on the grid because of a RLML cerberus which was applying is full dps at 60 while i had to stick at 20 to apply 400 dps and be at very close range from all of their inty / recons but well np np np, WE DONT NEED A FIX (sarcasm). |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
4
|
Posted - 2014.11.17 19:39:19 -
[6] - Quote
M1k3y Koontz wrote:baltec1 wrote:Phaade wrote:Kaerakh wrote: Honestly, after skimming the thread I think the main complaint is that people keep trying to use autocannons(specifically) like blasters or lasers. A basic solution is to kite blasters and get into nose bleed range with lasers. Something that autocannons out perform their competition respectively very well. Which is to say that range control is the primary concern of a Minmatar hull, and, considering that they have innate and bonused advantages to speed and sometimes agility, this should make them exceedingly good at that role.
So yeah, -1. Couldn't be more wrong. Please explain to me how projectiles are on par with drones. A Vagabond will literally never break the tank of a solo fit HAC, and if it can, it's out damaged hugely. Pop his drones while kiting them? Who flies a drone ship with anything other than sentries?
Gila / VNI and more and more ishtar. |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
4
|
Posted - 2014.11.19 23:52:46 -
[7] - Quote
C'mon CCP we're waiting.
|

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
4
|
Posted - 2014.11.22 01:16:58 -
[8] - Quote
Coz kitting is all about drones and missiles now...give some love to AC pls.
Maybe a fall off buff or a different way to set the damages over the fall off range for AC (this one is not possible i guess but meh)? |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
4
|
Posted - 2014.11.23 23:08:21 -
[9] - Quote
Coz vaga is life, he needs to be something else than a semi effective brawler, give us back a true damage projection, we can't compete with other ships at 20km... |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
4
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 13:03:20 -
[10] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote:Coz vaga is life, he needs to be something else than a semi effective brawler, give us back a true damage projection, we can't compete with other ships at 20km... So don't engage them at 20 km.
Feels like you dont understand what we are talking about, kite, autocannon,etc...
AC kitting stuff are made to be effective at point range, we're dealing 250 dps while most of the guys in front of us will be able to project way more damage than us, so everytimes we will need to GTFO which appears pretty often since the TE nerf.
Natural speed help us to get range, be able to runaway if things goes wrong, but if the target is able to project his damages at 20km at least, we wont be able kill it.
ATM AC kitting ships are only good at killing frigs, or some T1 cruisers, nothing more.
To apply damage we need to get closer from the target, but even at close range it still very poor, while we are taking a tons of risks.
Orthrus, for exemple has got the same speed, agility, tank as the cynabal, but it can project his damages so far and is able to keep at point range while taking almost no risk from being slingshoted from someone.
At this point, what is the AC kitting ships's role ? We are not the fastest anymore, we dont apply damages as much as our targets do for most of them.
So yeah actually there is no point to fly kitting ACs, only Machariel seems to fit well to roam thanks to his warp speed bonus, which fits pretty well with his roaming mentality but Cynabal need something else to perform in a role. |
|

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
4
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 13:10:57 -
[11] - Quote
Sigras wrote:Phaade wrote:Kaerakh wrote: Honestly, after skimming the thread I think the main complaint is that people keep trying to use autocannons(specifically) like blasters or lasers. A basic solution is to kite blasters and get into nose bleed range with lasers. Something that autocannons out perform their competition respectively very well. Which is to say that range control is the primary concern of a Minmatar hull, and, considering that they have innate and bonused advantages to speed and sometimes agility, this should make them exceedingly good at that role.
So yeah, -1. Couldn't be more wrong. Please explain to me how projectiles are on par with drones. A Vagabond will literally never break the tank of a solo fit HAC, and if it can, it's out damaged hugely. To be fair, a vagabond will never die to another solo fit HAC either... So a Vagabond is no threat to a solo HAC (outside of massive stupidity on the part of the solo HAC), but a solo HAC is no threat to a Vagabond (outside of massive stupidity on the part of the Vagabond) The thing that nobody in this thread seems to be taking into account is that a group of 3-4 vagabonds represents a serious threat to a similar group of 3-4 HACs, but are still immune to danger from those HACs... TL;DR people underestimate the ability to disengage. PS: wrong is an absolute state and not subject to gradation... something is either wrong or it isnt there is no such thing as "more wrong"
Do you want to talk about ishtars ? Gecko are fasters than a nano vaga. Do you want to talk about Deimos ? While you need to stay at 20-24km he can slingshot easily thanks to his amazing speed. Do you want to talk about cerberus ? Try to fight 4 cerberus with 4 vaga it'll be pretty fun to see /popcorn Do you want to talk about eagle ? He is way more tanked than you are with way more Dps at 20 km
Should i continue or ? |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
4
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 14:22:30 -
[12] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote:Quote: TL;DR people underestimate the ability to disengage.
minmatar. The best at running away from fights /thread Im sorry, but id actually like to kill what i catch and not have to run because it takes me 5min to kill a vexor while his gang is inbound.
Wait brah you can kill his friends's freg HUEHUEHUE. |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
4
|
Posted - 2014.11.26 23:21:55 -
[13] - Quote
#PrayForBlueAnswer |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
4
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 01:13:32 -
[14] - Quote
Winmatar pls. |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
4
|
Posted - 2014.12.04 02:24:56 -
[15] - Quote
Badman Lasermouse wrote:Eleven pages and I still can't get any love from the devs... Thanks for the bumps guys.
And thanks for creating this topic :p.
More Fall Off pls. |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Triumvirate.
4
|
Posted - 2014.12.11 21:25:46 -
[16] - Quote
bump coz AC need a blue answer |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
4
|
Posted - 2014.12.27 08:14:27 -
[17] - Quote
Adrie Atticus wrote:Cynabel Golemm Ravin Staber Phantom Cunfessor Nightmaer Tengoo
I'm now officially incapable of even finding the undock button because spelling things incorrectly is a straight correlation on piloting skills. If I do one more typo I might lose the ability to even switch between ships as I cannot distinguish between an Atron and a Thanatos.
No you're just a bastion, (jk off).
About numbers many ppl keep buying vagas / cyna because of their history and feel a touch of nostalgia when they are flying it, but actually that's all they are good about, bringing back good |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
4
|
Posted - 2014.12.28 00:43:56 -
[18] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Nodire Hermetz wrote: too see if a ship is good and/or popular you check one things first : Killboard
Ok then lets look at the KB. The current most deadly ship is the saber. The third most deadly ship and this months deadliest frigate is the Stiletto. In sixth place is the cynable, an apparently useless ship. Then we have the thrasher in tenth. Near all sabers and stilettos uses autos and the cynable and thrasher a 50/50 split between autos and arty. 4 out of the top ten deadliest ships isn't exactly the hallmarks of an underpowered class. Blaster boats have nothing in the top ten unless you count the proteus but if we do that we have to count the loki too.
Let's look at the cynabal kb, frigs, frigs, frigs, T1 cruiser, frigs, frigs.
Why sabre is the most deadliest ? Coz it's the most used dictor, thanks to his slot layout and his speed.
Stiletto ? Same good speed good slot layout, you're not looking for their damages, just their utility.
PPL has never said that cynabal was useless, he is still an anti-support, the worst in the game and his mainly used to gate camp (lol ?) ppl use it for his natural good scan res and mobility. |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
4
|
Posted - 2014.12.28 23:17:20 -
[19] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:Baltec1's Solo KillsWhen you've killed 18 ships solo, over your entire career, please don't come here and act like you are on top of the current Meta. I asked you before, please stop posting in my thread, you don't know what you are talking about. Best not to go down this path with a guy with a fleet doctrine named after him due to adapting hulls to any and every situation.
Gz, you created a blob setup, is it hard ? no
Pick a cheap hull, not skill intensive, which can deal damage at long range, is it hard to find ? no
Does it means that you are a genius ? Definetly no
https://zkillboard.com/kill/42350895/ Srly...
Ppl keep buying cynabal, well, does it mean that it's a good ship ? no
Most of them fly it because of its past, most of the kills come from few ppl that are ganking / camping.
Exemple ?
https://zkillboard.com/character/1631883104/
Could he used another ship to do it ? Yes |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
4
|
Posted - 2014.12.29 00:21:46 -
[20] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: As for that megathron, lets see if any of you know why it was fit like that and why the CFC allows me to fly it..
You fit it like this to be able to follow a tengu fleet while in mega (wahow, can i create setup for CFC now ? Was it a test ?)
Why CFC let you fly in ? Becoz you've no tengu skills ? |
|

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
4
|
Posted - 2014.12.29 01:50:27 -
[21] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote:
No, it's a fact, during many years this was expensive as hell and was shining because of its ability to fight, now it's not the case anymore.
Using that logic where are all the drakes?
BC nerf + Tiers 3 + Missile nerf + Mainly a doctrine ship. |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 05:33:18 -
[22] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:Because what other f******* choice to Mini pilots have? Arty and no tank? Or should they just disregard ship bonuses entirely? Minimitar don't have resistance bonus' or drone damage bonus', more than half of them are double gun damage bonuses. IE The Rupture, Cane, Tempest. So if they are so bad why are they ALL on par with the other ships out there or better? They are not. According the the KM data they are. About the only cruiser that is doing poorly is the Agouror.Cynables using 425mm autos scored more kills alone than every single phantasm. 220mm vulcan cynables killed twice as many ships as every single orthrus. No other pirate faction cruiser even gets close to matching the cynable and here you are asking for it to be buffed.
Are you actually comparing a logi cruiser to the cynabal ... ?
Orthrus is far better than the cynabal, his only problem is his cost.
Phantasm is not an usual ship because almost nobody give it a try, too many time spent as a **** cruiser.
Then again, most of the ppl get cynabal because of it's past, his actual price and his mobility.
Actually, you can't effectively fly a kitting cynabal, that's a fact, try by yourself if you dont trust us. |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:08:43 -
[23] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:You are aware that the Cyna has been around for much longer than many of the other Pirate cruisers right? And that the Phantasm just recently had its bonus' reworked?
Baltec1, your a troll and you've dragged my thread down into this BS. Thanks. The cynabal is just as old as the other pirate faction ships and it is out killing the vigilant too. Giving facts in a thread asking to undo the TE nerfs for autos is not trolling.
Btw cynabal was the go to ship during many years, and was pretty expensive for many players (over 250m).
Vigilant is pretty situational and expensive as hell, there is only few situation were vigilant will overcome a loki web, because of it's range and tank.
baltec1 wrote: No, Im pointing out a ship that actually is underused.
Ofc that the augoror is used, but why the **** are you talking about KB stats of a LOGI ship... It's not supposed to get on KM ... |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:18:53 -
[24] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote: Ofc that the augoror is used, but why the **** are you talking about KB stats of a LOGI ship... It's not supposed to get on KM ...
People have been saying a/c ships are not popular and dont get used. The agouror is an example of what an underused ship looks like.
How do you rank up on killboards ?
By appearing on KILLMAILS !
How are you supposed to appear on killmail while you are LOGI ?
I hope that you are not serious while saying this kind of things... 
Leeching on KMs with drones... meh |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:40:33 -
[25] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote:How do you rank up on killboards ? By appearing on KILLMAILS ! How are you supposed to appear on killmail while you are LOGI ? I hope that you are not serious while saying this kind of things...  The Scythe got 5,247 kills last month, the Exequror 3,750. Logi ships do get killmails, the agouror and osprey don't because they don't see much use.
Feels like you dont play to this game....
Scythe is used by most of the welp fleets, as is the exequror, augoror is doing a pretty good job as the osprey but ppl dont use it over Guardian / basi as they are mostly looking for cap chain a solid ship.
In NS blob ppl will prefer Scythe Exeq because of rep effectivness over cap chain, is that hard to understand ?
baltec1 wrote:
I used two examples, three with the vigilant. Even the Gila came nowhere near the cynable. .
I've already aswered to it earlier. |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 07:03:22 -
[26] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote:
In NS blob ppl will prefer Scythe Exeq because of rep effectivness over cap chain, is that hard to understand ?
What part of "it is an example of an underused ship" do you not understand? .
Situational ships...
Why using a scimitar over a basilisk ?
Why using guardian over a Oneiros ?
Because they have not the same role.
baltec1 wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote:
I've already aswered to it earlier.
Yet people will continue to say blasters overshadow autos.
Vigilant is situational their is only few ways were it will overshadow loki as webber.
-Dread Blap -Gate camp -Webbing a 100mn cruiser -Webbing cap to make them warp fast (lol)
Blaster overshadow AC brawling ship while AC do not worth it as a kitting platform, do you understand thaaaat ? |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 07:12:43 -
[27] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote:
Vigilant is situational their is only few ways were it will overshadow loki as webber.
-Dread Blap -Gate camp -Webbing a 100mn cruiser -Webbing cap to make them warp fast (lol)
Blaster overshadow AC brawling ship while AC do not worth it as a kitting platform, do you understand thaaaat ?
So again you're saying that many alliance are using it, but ask to your CFC pilots how they use their cynabals, do they really kite with ? or just rush people like all of the cynabals pilots that i've seen in the last month ...
So, blasters overpower a/c but the vigilant is a situational ship despite being a thorax on steroids... These arguments make zero sense. We have the evidenmce that shows auto cannon ships are either killing just as many targets as the other ships or better. There is no evidence that shows a/c need to be buffed. Infact, all evidence shows they would be overpowered if you do buff them.
Mb because their are ships that will be better at being damage dealer and will cost less while being more resistant ? |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 07:32:31 -
[28] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote:
Mb because their are ships that will be better at being damage dealer and will cost less while being more resistant ?
You do realise the vigilant has the longest ranged blasters in the cruiser lineup don't you?
Deimos has the same range, fail ? |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 08:54:14 -
[29] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Stitch Kaneland wrote:
Unlikely. Did you forget about drones? Ishtars/vexors online? Infact, acs would be a decent counter to those ships. Not a dunking, but a gf.
Also, looking at the old thread people were bitching about the talos more than minmatar stuff. A lot has been rebalanced since then.
Having lived though it it was the cynabals that dominated with the cane, vagabond, SFI and stabber close behind. You plan will bring that horrible age back.
Cool story, now there is RLML, OP drone boat and a **** tons of inty ...
|

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 13:35:46 -
[30] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Stitch Kaneland wrote:
Unlikely. Did you forget about drones? Ishtars/vexors online? Infact, acs would be a decent counter to those ships. Not a dunking, but a gf.
Also, looking at the old thread people were bitching about the talos more than minmatar stuff. A lot has been rebalanced since then.
Having lived though it it was the cynabals that dominated with the cane, vagabond, SFI and stabber close behind. You plan will bring that horrible age back.
Pretty useless to talk with someone which is just fearing an another cynabal/vaga domination while the game has change and doesn't wants to see the reality.
You're speaking about a ship while you're not even flying it and don't want to accept the actual facts... Try to be relevant pls
You're even lying that's were things are funny.
Buff the AC to get the pre-TE nerf fall off, only way to compete in the actual game. |
|

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
10
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 17:18:36 -
[31] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: All this shows is that you want overpowered a/c boats back because they don't dominate like they used to.
We want ships that are able to compete in the current meta, is that hard to understand ? |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
10
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 05:45:53 -
[32] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: EFT damage numbers are, to put it bluntly, near useless. For example, the large autos on my mach come out as 66km range, in game they are alphaing frigates all the way out to 90km. The only thing stopping them for going any further is the locking range of the ship.
NPC frigates dont count. |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
10
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 07:22:51 -
[33] - Quote
Starrakatt wrote: Pirate Faction / Kills / Weapon Systems 1. Cynabal: 2641 / 60% AC + 40% Arty - 2th after Orthrus with AC 2. Orthrus: 2003 / Rapid Lights 3. Gila: 1262 / Drones 4. Stratios: 1182 / Drones 5. Phantasm: 690 / 50% Pulse/Beams 6. Vigilant: 562 / 60% Blasters + 40% Rails
AC fitting doesnt mean that it's a kitting ship...
Last AC fitted cynabal :
https://zkillboard.com/kill/43611219/
https://zkillboard.com/kill/43610972/
https://zkillboard.com/kill/43610329/
https://zkillboard.com/kill/43609912/
https://zkillboard.com/kill/43609059/
https://zkillboard.com/kill/43608950/
https://zkillboard.com/kill/43608839/
https://zkillboard.com/kill/43608657/
https://zkillboard.com/kill/43607952/
Yes there is not a lot of kitting cyna... Or ppl are trying to say that 180 and less is enought to kite... Is that a joke ? |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
24
|
Posted - 2015.01.20 16:28:48 -
[34] - Quote
WE DID IT, OP SUCCES.
"7.5%" OH WAIT NO NO NO NO. |

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
24
|
Posted - 2015.01.20 16:36:49 -
[35] - Quote
Nodire Hermetz wrote:it's a ninja nerf dude , read carefully
Yep, fausse joie. |
|
|
|